Developmental Dimensionality and Morphological Geometry: A Mathematical Framework for Plant Evo-Devo
What's this about?
Why are ferns fractal? A gene regulatory network is not an algorithm computing morphology—it is a low-dimensional constraint manifold through which high-dimensional molecular dynamics must flow. A narrow channel cannot transmit complex morphological signals, regardless of the underlying dynamics.
The central equation bounds morphological complexity by channel dimension:
where is the developmental dimensionality (measured by participation ratio) and is the Kolmogorov complexity of the morphology.
Key empirical finding: Duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza), despite being an angiosperm, has developmental dimensionality —matching ancient liverworts and 3.7× lower than Arabidopsis ().
This confirms the central prediction: morphological complexity, not phylogenetic age, determines developmental dimensionality. Low-dimensional GRNs force recursive self-similar morphologies because the same narrow channel constrains growth at every scale.
Key findings
- •
GRN as constraint manifold: shapes flow, not computes morphology
- •
Participation ratio bounds:
- •
Metabolic cost scaling:
- •
Duckweed D_dev = 1.99 matches ancient liverworts despite angiosperm phylogeny
Citation
Todd, I. (2026). Developmental Dimensionality and Morphological Geometry: A Mathematical Framework for Plant Evo-Devo. In preparation.
Workflow: Claude Code with Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) for drafting, simulation code, and figures. Author reviewed all content and takes full responsibility.