← Back to Papers
In Preparation

Developmental Dimensionality and Morphological Geometry: A Mathematical Framework for Plant Evo-Devo

In preparation (2026)

What's this about?

Why are ferns fractal? A gene regulatory network is not an algorithm computing morphology—it is a low-dimensional constraint manifold through which high-dimensional molecular dynamics must flow. A narrow channel cannot transmit complex morphological signals, regardless of the underlying dynamics.

The central equation bounds morphological complexity by channel dimension:

K(M)O(Dlog1ε)K(M) \leq O(D \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})

where DD is the developmental dimensionality (measured by participation ratio) and K(M)K(M) is the Kolmogorov complexity of the morphology.

Key empirical finding: Duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza), despite being an angiosperm, has developmental dimensionality Ddev=1.99D_{\text{dev}} = 1.99—matching ancient liverworts and 3.7× lower than Arabidopsis (Ddev=7.30D_{\text{dev}} = 7.30).

This confirms the central prediction: morphological complexity, not phylogenetic age, determines developmental dimensionality. Low-dimensional GRNs force recursive self-similar morphologies because the same narrow channel constrains growth at every scale.

Key findings

  • GRN as constraint manifold: shapes flow, not computes morphology

  • Participation ratio bounds: 1PR(C)r1 \leq \text{PR}(\mathbf{C}) \leq r

  • Metabolic cost scaling: Ctotal(D)=Θ(D2γ)C_{\text{total}}(D) = \Theta(D^{2\gamma})

  • Duckweed D_dev = 1.99 matches ancient liverworts despite angiosperm phylogeny

Citation

Todd, I. (2026). Developmental Dimensionality and Morphological Geometry: A Mathematical Framework for Plant Evo-Devo. In preparation.

Workflow: Claude Code with Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) for drafting, simulation code, and figures. Author reviewed all content and takes full responsibility.